1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dusya [7]
3 years ago
7

Need asap

Mathematics
1 answer:
Crank3 years ago
5 0
4/10 because 10-6 is 4 :)
You might be interested in
A recent survey of 50 executives who were laid off during a recent recession revealed it took a mean of 26 weeks for them to fin
drek231 [11]

Answer:

The pvalue of 0.0113 < 0.05 means that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to find another position is less than 28 weeks at the 5% level of significance

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is:

H_{0} = 28

The alternate hypotesis is:

H_{1} < 28

The test statistic is:

z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}

In which X is the sample mean, \mu is the value tested at the null hypothesis, \sigma is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

A recent survey of 50 executives who were laid off during a recent recession revealed it took a mean of 26 weeks for them to find another position.

This means that n = 50, X = 26

Assume the population standard deviation is 6.2 weeks.

This means that \sigma = 6.2

Does the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to find another position is less than 28 weeks at the 5% level of significance

We have to find the pvalue of Z, looking at the z-table, when \mu = 28. It if is lower than 0.05, it provides evidence.

z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}

z = \frac{26 - 28}{\frac{6.2}{\sqrt{50}}}

z = -2.28

z = -2.28 has a pvalue of 0.0113 < 0.05.

The pvalue of 0.0113 < 0.05 means that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to find another position is less than 28 weeks at the 5% level of significance

5 0
3 years ago
What is the rescursive formula for this geometric sequence? 7, -14, 28, -56
Anastasy [175]
Well, from looking at the numbers listed, they’re all multiplied by -2, (negative two) and so on, as you go through the number sequence.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the prime factorization of 138
Natali [406]

Answer:

138 ÷ 2 = 69

69 ÷ 2 = 34.5

69 ÷ 3 = 23

23 ÷ 3 = 7.67

23 ÷ 5 = 4.6

23 ÷ 7 = 3.2857

23 ÷ 11 = 2.0909

-----------------------

23 ÷ 23 = 1

7 0
3 years ago
Is 5 5/6 + 1 3/4=5 1/12 reasonable
ira [324]

Answer:

No, it is unreasonable.

Step-by-step explanation:

5/5/6+1/3/4=35/6+7/4

=70/12+21/12

=91/12

=7 7/12

4 0
3 years ago
Simplify 659/8 . What is the answer rounded to the nearest whole number? 82 83 84
fredd [130]
659 divided by 8 = 82 R3.

So the answer is 82.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help with math homework problem! thank you!!
    14·2 answers
  • **GIVING OUT BRAINLIEST**
    15·1 answer
  • a rectangular prism has a height of 12 centimetres and a square base with sides measuring 5 centimetres, a pyramid with the same
    9·1 answer
  • I need help simplifying<br> 7x + 3 - 2x + 9
    9·2 answers
  • -2x +4=8x-6 equations/inequalities
    15·2 answers
  • Round the number 385 to the nearest 10
    5·2 answers
  • Why is it important to line up the fraction strips on the left
    13·1 answer
  • What is 5+21 and 54+1
    9·2 answers
  • The expression 2x+(x-7)^2 is equivalent to x^2+bx+49 for all the values of x. what is the value of b?
    12·1 answer
  • Help please! I need this for math to finish my test.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!