The answer to this quesiton is <span> oversimplify the contents.
Every social occurences that happen could always be analyzed through different point of view, which will make us understand why and how the occurence happens. When we only focus on the conclusion, we will ignore the point of view that presented by the opposite factors of your argument which make your research seem biased.
</span>
Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
Answer: There are many risks. Online auctions are one of the most successful business in the internet.
In this cases can happen manipulation, the products can be fake, the site may be not real, fraud.
It is important to have knowledge about the site and, do some research before buying, is important to protect yourself.
