According to Malthusian theory of population, population increases in a geometrical ratio, whereas food supply increases in an arithmetic ratio. This disharmony would lead to widespread poverty and starvation, which would only be checked by natural occurrences such as disease, high infant mortality, famine, war or moral restraint. His main contribution is in the agricultural sector. According to this theory there are two steps to control the population: preventative and positive checks. Preventative means control in birth rate, and uses of different methods to control birth; and positive checks means natural calamities, war, etc. His theory was wrong because Malthus only considered two factors when he established his basic graph: food supply and population growth. Other factors such as improvements in technology proved him wrong. He was right at his time but development made him wrong. If it wasn't for outside influences on population growth and food supply, his mathematical reasoning which proved his theory and was right. I HOPED THIS HELPED
Its like the word Coca Cola. Its so fun to say
Answer:
The answer is stated below.
Explanation:
The Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States abolished slavery. The Fourteenth amendment ensures equal protection of all the citizens of the United States and the Fifteenth amendment enforced that there should be no discrimination of voting rights on the basis of race or color.
However, the Blacks got right on the paper but in reality, the situation was the opposite. Not just the violence but discriminatory laws undermined the situation of Blacks.
Answer:
Select only the statements below that:” A. that analytical philosophy provides definite answers to ethical dilemmas“Prof. Bill Bakers sets out as the purpose of this course. Correct answers receive positive partial credit. Incorrect answers receive negative partial credit. The score is the sum of partial credits but not less than zero.
Explanation:
Analytic philosophy is a tradition of philosophy that began around the turn of the 20th century and continues to today. Like any philosophical tradition it includes many conflicting thinkers in a broad umbrella with its own particular lineage and history and so is resistant to a clean-cut summary.
