Answer:
Ratio values cannot be judged in isolation. For example, the Phone Corporation's ratios calculated previously have no industry benchmarks against which they can be compared. The ratios for competitor can also be used for comparison. Again, the ratios were calculated for only one period in each case. There should be a trend analysis and computation of ratios over some years in order to assess their strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, they do not look strong. But, one should not be too quick to conclude on this issue.
Explanation:
Ratio analysis is a technical method of gaining insight into a company's liquidity, operational efficiency, and profitability by comparing the elements of its financial statements such as the balance sheet and income statement. While ratio analysis is a cornerstone of fundamental equity analysis, it must be noted that the values produced are just relative measures which cannot be meaningful without being related to some benchmarks or compared over a number of years.
Answer:
The correct answer is "$155".
Explanation:
Given:
She sells to miller,
= $90
She sells to baker,
= $145
She sells to consumers,
= $155
Now,
The value added by miller will be:
= 
= 
($)
The value added by the baker will be:
= 
= 
($)
hence,
The GDP in this economy will be:
= 
($)
Transportation costs
can make exporting an inappropriate strategy.
<span>If a product is bulky or heavy, because
of its weight or mass the transportation costs will obviously increase and make it more expensive, and
unless the product carries an extraordinary high value-to-weight ratio the
exporting strategy will be considered the least effective.</span>
Answer:
1.- Without Retrospective effect
2.- No as it comes from a change in estimations not an accounting error.
3.- yes. It will give a full explanation about the reasons to extend the useful life.
4.- Depreciation expense for 2021: 60,000
Explanation:
1.- The change in the useful life does not represent an accounting error. It comes from the estimation process.
800,000 - 160,000 x 2 = 480,000 book value at beginning 2021
480,000 / 8 new useful life = 60,000 depreciation per year.
Answer:
Financial disadvantage of 138,600
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&produce&buy&Differential\\$Purchase&&-447,000&-447,000\\$Avoidable\: Cost&-283,400&0&283,400\\$Unavoidable\: Cost&-114,400&-114,400&0\\$Total Cost&-397,800&-561,400&-163,600\\$additional segment&0&25,000&25,000\\$Net Effect&-397,800&-536,400&-138,600\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26produce%26buy%26Differential%5C%5C%24Purchase%26%26-447%2C000%26-447%2C000%5C%5C%24Avoidable%5C%3A%20Cost%26-283%2C400%260%26283%2C400%5C%5C%24Unavoidable%5C%3A%20Cost%26-114%2C400%26-114%2C400%260%5C%5C%24Total%20Cost%26-397%2C800%26-561%2C400%26-163%2C600%5C%5C%24additional%20segment%260%2625%2C000%2625%2C000%5C%5C%24Net%20%20Effect%26-397%2C800%26-536%2C400%26-138%2C600%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The allocate cost and teh depreciation cost will be unavoidable, so should be considered as a cost for the purchase option
Also the inocme from teh additional segment is only considered for the purchase option
<u>The avoidable cost will be:</u>
Direct Materials
Direct Labors
Variable overhead
Supervisor
Thse cost are zero in the purchase escenario
