Answer:
a fired
b quit
Explanation:
involuntary is not by choice
voluntary is by choice
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The transfer payment comprises of both a donor as well as a receiver, with the sender giving up something that is of worth and receiving anything in return, unlike the swap agreement that equally benefits all the parties concerned.
Transfer payments cover Social Security, Medicaid, unemployment compensation, social programs and assistance. They should not be added in GDP, as they are not payments for goods or services, but rather ways to distribute money for social purposes.
Answer:
$200 billion
Explanation:
Okun's law (or rule of thumb) states that for every 1% point drop in unemployment, the total output of the economy will increase by two percent.
In this case, since unemployment varies by 1% (= 5.5% - 4.5%), that would mean that the potential GDP differs in $200 billion (= $10 trillion x 2%) depending on which economist's unemployment estimation we use.