Answer:
actor-observer discrepancy
Explanation:
Actor-observer discrepancy: In social psychology, the term actor-observer discrepancy or bias is defined as an individual's propensity to attribute his or her actions to some external causes whereas he or she attributes the other person's behavior or actions to some internal causes.
It is considered as a form of attributional bias that leads to develop the way an individual interacts or perceive the other person. It generally covers others and one's behavioral attributions.
In the question above, the given statement is referred to as actor-observer discrepancy.
Pretty sure it was Darwin... While most scholars didn't travel long distances at that time, Darwin did. he experienced in remote areas the diversity of life and evolution of a species.
<span>he nature versus nurture debate is about the relative influence of an individual's innate attributes as opposed to the experiences from the environment one is brought up in, in determining individual differences in physical and behavioral traits. The philosophy that humans acquire all or most of their behavioral traits from "nurture" is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate"). Nature refers to an individual's innate qualities, while nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism).</span>
Answer:
What are the options
Explanation:
Or is it not multiple choice
