I personally think that both would be a good idea. It also depends on how bad the budget deficit is. if the government would raise taxes by like 1% it wouldn't be to bad. they could also not give as many funds to things that arn't important like maybe a science investigation that isn't very useful. but if they would decrease spendings on, for exaple medicare that would effect people in a not so good way. but if they raised taxes too much it could also effect people badly. hope this helped
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
In going to the library and finding a quiet room to study, Sam was increasing his <u>mindfulness</u>.
<h3>What is mindfulness?</h3>
This is the state of being aware of what is going on around you as well as what you are currently engaged in.
Sam was engaged in studying and wanted to be more aware of what he was studying and so went to the library where he wouldn't be distracted. This increased his awareness of his studies and his mindfulness.
Find out more on mindfulness at brainly.com/question/585640.
I think it is B <span> By allowing more labor unions</span>
