A policy of extending a nation power by gaining political and economic control over other nation.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
The answer is D. <span>Cheetahs with longer legs are more likely to capture prey.</span>
Answer:
Experts are of the opinion that some or all of the inhabitants of Nepal in the ancient period were likely called 'Nepals', which meant that the word 'Nepal' was used to refer to both the land and its population. These Nepals are considered the progenitors of modern-day Newars.
The effect of Britain passing the Townshend act:
colonists boycotted taxed goods in protests and daughters of liberty produced substituted goods
The effect of Britain sending a warship to New England:
More tension grew between Britain and the colonies resulted in the American revolution
