A. To separate warring states
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
D is the correct answer.
Most of the time, the State Government provides guidance and money to local governments that are in the process of executing state programs.
Depending on the subject area, this might mean the local governments running their permits by the State or just asking for guidance on education proposals.
Explanation:
<em>Politically, Nepal has seen a lot of changes in the last five years. The country has already turned into a federal, democratic republic by abolishing the monarchy since 2008. However, the country's economic agenda remains the old one. In the context of growing economic aspirations of the people, Nepal needs to formulate a long term vision for the country. </em>
It offers a major leverage point for dealing
with the bombardment of the following historical information.
