Answer:
D) An illusory promise
Explanation:
An illusory promise is not enforceable. Illusory promises are simply illusions that seem or appear to a contract, but are not.
In this case, there is no consideration at all, therefore none of the parties is bound by a contract. It would be different if the company promised to pay a bonus if its profits are xx%. How can someone determine what is considered high profits, and how can you be sure that management will agree?
It is basically like telling someone else that you will give them something if you are happy and willing to do it. How can someone determine if you are happy or not, and how can someone know if you are willing to do it or not?
Answer:
The correct answer is: C. larger decrease in total risk.
Explanation:
The risk of an investment portfolio refers to the possibilities of obtaining the return, profit or profit you expect. Every investment involves a risk, and the more you can earn, the greater the risk. If you put your money on a fixed term, the risk is minimal, but it hardly gives you an interest even less than inflation. If you invest in the forex market, for example, you can earn a lot of money, but also the risk (that you do not achieve and even that you lose what you invested) is much greater. Every investor knows that he must assume some risk, because it is something inherent in the investment.
Answer:
B. Increase production and thus increase the supply.
Explanation:
As the price of Jeans rises, the Levi Strauss is likely to increase production keeping other factors constant as per the law of supply, where quantity is directly proportional to the price of goods and services. As the price of goods increase, the quantity supply of product also increased by supplier or manufacturer to maximize the profit out of the current market condition.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
Answer:
Priscilla's homemade dividend per share be in 2017 will be $3.585
Explanation:
In order to calculate what will be Priscilla's homemade dividend per share be in 2017 we would have to use the following formula:
homemade dividend=(Dividend in 2016×(1+Required rate))+Dividend in 2017
homemade dividend=($1×(1+8.5%))+$2.50
homemade dividend=$1.085+$2.50=$3.585
Priscilla's homemade dividend per share be in 2017 will be $3.585
