Answer:
And for this case 
The % of variation is given by the determination coefficient given by
and on this case
, so then the % of variation explained is 20.25%.
The proportion of the variability seen in final grade performance that can be predicted by math ability scores is 20.25%.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we asume that we fit a linear model:

Where y represent the final grade and x the math ability scores
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
The correlation coeffcient is given by:
And for this case 
The % of variation is given by the determination coefficient given by
and on this case
, so then the % of variation explained is 20.25%.
The proportion of the variability seen in final grade performance that can be predicted by math ability scores is 20.25%.
Though it looks like BE ≅ CE ≅ AD and BA ≅ BX ≅ DX, these congruencies are not indicated either on the drawing or in the problem statement. Thus they cannot be relied upon.
There is exactly 1 isosceles triangle in the figure.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
idk number one.
Number 2- the answer is (C) because $6.50 minus the $5 is $1.50 and then that divided by $0.50 is 3.
Number 3- The answer is (A) and i dont feel lie explaining it
Number 4- The answer is (B)
Number 5- Im just going to say that it's probably going to be (C)
Number 6- i think its (D)
The x-intercept is present where y = 0
2x + 5y - 10 = 0
2x - 10 = -5y
2x - 10 = -5(0)
2x = 10
x = 5
The y-intercept is present where x = 0
2x + 5y = 10
2x + 5y - 10 = 0
5y - 10 = -2(0)
5y = 10
y = 2