B libertarians is the answer
Answer:
It is TRUE that to define an act as deviant is to make a subjective judgment, but it can be objectively determined that all deviant acts have a negative impact on the moral standards of a society.
Explanation:
Deviant behaviors, or deviant acts in society refer to behavior that violate social norms and expectations. Deviance can be something as small as dressing in gothic clothing, or something as serious as burning someone's house down.
Morals are the prevailing standards of behavior that enable people to live cooperatively in groups. Moral refers to what societies sanction as right and acceptable. Most people tend to act morally and follow societal guidelines. Morality describes the particular values of a specific group at a specific point in time.
Answer:
If Holt and Collins retain the right to a Class action.
Explanation:
Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of court. The Parties involved in the case refer their disputes to an arbitrator who will making a decision after reviewing the evidence and listening to the parties.
Arbitration clauses can be mandatory or voluntary, and the arbitrator's decision may be binding or nonbinding. (binding means you are not going to court again, but would abide by the decisions if the arbitrator).
Furthermore, the Arbitration is a legal technique used by the parties involved in a dispute to resolve the disputes outside the courts, the parties refer the disputes to one or more persons called either the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal", by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound.
Then A "class action" lawsuit or the
"mass tort litigation" is one in which a group of people with the same or similar injuries caused by the same product or action sue the defendant as a group. It can also be called the "multi-district litigation".
If Holt and Collins decide to retain the right to a Class action, it will definitely not be the result of an arbitration.
Hello there, thank you for the question! ^w^
The correct answer would be true!
"Why did we ban retroactive criminal laws? Because they undermine the "central values" of free societies. To allow this would threated the rule of law itself, it would become a rule of officials instead."
Have a great day! <3
