Rodney can best be described as a <u>Revolutionary-Crusader</u> leader as he challenged the status quo and has been guided by adaptation by taking over the position of the divisional head.
<h3>Who is a leader?</h3>
A leader is a person who sets an example for their subordinates and guides them well by applying one of the leadership styles.
Revolutionary-Crusader is one of the archetypes in leadership. It refers to a leader who has challenged the status quo, that is, the current scenario of social or political concerns, and advocated a sense of adaptation among people.
Therefore, Rodney has been viewed as a Revolutionary-Crusader leader in accordance with the leadership archetypes.
Learn more about the leadership archetypes in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14656651
#SPJ1
A solid grasp on the instruments and controls at your disposal
I think.. that is correct
Answer:
custodial
Explanation:
when parents divorce and move to separate residences the parents who live in the same household as the children referred as the custodial parent.
A custodial parent is the parent who is given physical or legitimate authority of a youngster by court request. Joint physical guardianship, or shared child rearing, implies that the kid lives with the two guardians for rise to or around equivalent measures of time. In joint care, the two guardians are custodial guardians and neither one of the parents is a non-custodial parent.
Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
Answer:
A, neglect
Explanation:
All the other ones were talking about giving up something(abandonment),being responsible( good Samaritan), Having an approval to do something specific(Consent) But, from all of those Neglect was the one not being responsible in fear and being an able to take actions.
