The big difference between the CIO and the Chief Digital Officer is the responsibility for turning IT into a value creator, which is something that the CIO typically doesn’t have in most organizations.
<h3>How to compare the difference?</h3>
The chief digital officer is the leading digital business from the front in a way that most CIOs aren’t. It should be that most CIOs are not trying to think of new markets, new channels, or new business models that the organization should be getting and making that a top priority. .
The CIO is used to operate much larger operations. The Chief Digital Officers are very multidisciplinary, so they have a lot of different experiences, and they're very comfortable talking with marketing and sales in their language.
They’re very good at talking to the product teams in their language and operations in their language, and executives, and so on. And not to the same degree that we see the CIOs that don’t really talk the language of business .
Learn more about digital media on:
brainly.com/question/25356502
#SPJ1
Answer:
The production level that maximizes Silky's profit is 
ties.
Explanation:
Hi
First of all, as we have 
, we need to transcript it as price in function of the quantity so
Then we need to find income function that is 
. After derivate it 
.
The optimum level is when we have 
, therefore,
, as we clear it for 
we find that
, finally as we have that is measured in hundreds of ties, the production level that maximizes Silky's profit is ties.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": average person in the economy.
Explanation:
The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measures the level of output of a country given a certain period -by quarter and year, usually. It considers <em>government expenditures, private investments, consumer spending, </em>and <em>net exports </em>(exports minus imports).
The GDP per capita represents the GDP per person and is calculated by dividing the GDP by the population of a country. GDP per capita represents an approximate of the expenses of an individual. Smaller richer countries such as Luxembourg or Switzerland tend to have higher GDP per capita.
Answer:
<u>Option B</u> must pay him as an employee, withhold appropriate taxes and issue a W-2 at year end
Explanation: He is paid based on hours worked, and uses the company equipment thus is an employee who is controlled by an employer. The independent contractors buy their own supplies, provide their own equipment and paid based on tasks performed
This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
