Answer:
Hello.
Explanation:
True brain discharge >>> http://mavizion.com
Answer:
Stakeholder's Tolerance Level.
Explanation:
Stakeholders' tolerance levels are key to completing a full risk management plan. This is because the tolerances are critical to determining which hazards need to be accepted and the ones to be limited. Basically, a stakeholder risk tolerance seeks to determine, assess and gauge the general level of risk an entity is willing to undertake and/or accept.
When an organization intends to do a project, for instance, varying reports including feasibility reports need to be come up with to assess the realization objective of the project. While coming up with this, an organization must assess its tolerance levels as to factors that may hinder the realization of the underlying goal.
There are often two categories of tolerance level. A high tolerance, and a low tolerance. A high tolerance in this instance would be more opened to factors that might put the project into high risk tendency. Whereas, the opposite is the low tolerance, as this is not opened to high risk tendency. However, to arrive at this, an organization will need to come up with a comprehensive management plan, detailing the risk levels, appetite and how aversive they could be in undergoing a given concern. Tolerance levels should be evaluated at critical decision making juncture. From the input, quality, performance, in process, and other essential line items. Tolerance level is set across all functions. This will thus form a general guide an organization intends to pursue.
Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.
Answer:
<h2>
a. The Preferred stock is noncumulative.</h2>
Preferred stock
= 7,710 * 17.5 * 8%
= $10,794
Per share
= 10,794/7,710
= $1.40
Common Shareholders.
= 63,800 - 10,794
= $53,006
Per share
= 53,006/49,000
= $1.08
<h2>
b. Preferred stock is cumulative. </h2>
This means that if preferred dividends are not paid in a year, they will be accrued and paid when they can.
Preferred stock
= 7,710 * 3 years (2017,2018,2019)
= $23,130
Per share = 23,130/7,710
= $3
Common stock
= 63,800 - 23,130
= $40,670
Per share
= 40,670/49,000
= $0.83
c. Why were the dividends per share of common stock less for the cumulative preferred stock than the noncumulative preferred stock?
b. The dividends in arrears on the preferred stock had to be fulfilled before dividends could be paid for the current year.
75 it depends on the persons background with education .
