Answer:
D. all of the above
Explanation:
The water molecules have surrounded salt (NaCl) ions in the given diagram.
Salt get dissolve in water as both are polar, having positive and negative charges and both have electrical charges. Covalent bonds in water molecules are more stronger than the ionic bonds of salts, that is why salt dissolve in water.
Water molecules and salt molecules form electrostatic interaction in which the positively charges ends of water molecules are attracted to the negative chloride ions (Cl- ion) while negative ends of the water molecules are attracted to the positive sodium ion (Na+ ion).
Water molecule breaks the ionic bond between sodium and chloride ions. Water molecules form hydration shell around sodium (Na+) and calcium (Cl-) ions and allow the salt to dissolve in water and forma homogeneous solution.
Hence, the correct option is "D. All of the above".
Answer:
1. It should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. There are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but I can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.
2. Yes. First, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. The pros involve better medical treatment. The cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. Looking at DNA markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. And OK, actually I suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency.
Brainliest pleaseeeee??
