Hey I have read this a while ago so unfortunately I cannot give you detailed textual evidences. However I can give you some original written ideas.
Basically Brutus uses pure logic in his speech in order to modify his act of murdering his friend. He does take blame and also proves his nobility by saying (or repeating) that he loved Caesar. His speech concludes to Brutus not having sufficient impact on his listeners (at least less than that of Antony). Brutus can indeed be classified as a noble man, as he leaves the place and allows Antony to have his regards paid towards Julius Caesar.
Antony however makes use of numerous emotional gestures, along with expressions in order to awaken the attention of wrong done towards Caesar. He initiates his speech with saying that he can barely talk due to his grief. He further supports his arguments by saying that Caesar was innocent and a noble and well mannered man as well.
Juliet’s parents would have Excepted the marriage Romeo would never have been banished in Romeo and Juliet would never have killed themselves and there would be no field and Juliet would not have had to marry Paris and they both would have lived
The denotative definition of a word is its literal meaning. This would be the meaning one would find in the dictionary.
By contrast, the connotative definition is the meaning associated with the word. It is the implied meaning of the word.
For example, the words in bold have the same denotation but different connotations:
-- a beautiful woman
-- a handsome woman
-- a pretty woman
While all these words mean the same thing, they do not have the same associations.
<span>I am pretty sure that the first evidence represented as an option can best support the statement that is being shown. As for me, the statement ''information about studies on ddt’s effect on eggs'' is the only right answer that really makes sense. Actually, the last sentence led me to pick this option as correct one. I do hope it will help you in some measure. Regards. <span>
</span></span>