Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Take the far side original length and dilated length 3/9 divide it = 1/3 and that’s the answer
Answer:
7
4
Step-by-step explanation:
The <u>actual values</u> are shown on the given graph as <u>blue points</u>.
The <u>line of regression</u> is shown on the given graph as the <u>red line</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2000 the actual rainfall was 43 cm, shown by point (2000, 43). It appears that the regression line is at y = 50 when x is the year 2000.
⇒ Difference = 50 - 43 = 7 cm
<u>In 2000, the actual rainfall was </u><u>7</u><u> centimeters below what the model predicts</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2003 the actual rainfall was 44 cm, shown by point (2003, 40). It appears that the regression line is at y = 40 when x is the year 2003.
⇒ Difference = 44 - 40 = 4 cm
<u>In 2003, the actual rainfall was </u><u>4</u><u> centimeters above what the model predicts.</u>
From the figure, the vertices of the given triangle are
(-3,4), (1,3) and (5,5).
The given transformation is (x,y) -> (x+3, y-2).
Therefore the coordinates of the transformed triangle are
(-3+3,4-2), (1+3,3-2), (5+3,5-2) = (0,2), (4,1), (8,3)
The transformed triangle is shown in red color.
If this is all the information you have, it is not enough to conclude the region is square. we need more information