I'd say B and D. Elementary school reports don't necessarily equate to knowledge of a subject (and research on the branches of government doesn't help you know <em>how</em> to govern), so A is out. C is nice, but popularity and charm do not a leader make, he might have ulterior motives to being as such, maybe taking advantage of the power? B and D show things he has done that would give him useful skills in the position.
Answer:
comparison and contrast connection
Explanation:
In simple words, A comparative-and-contrast article analyses three students by either referencing them, clashing them, or even both. The objective of composing a compare or contrast dissertation would be not to show the apparent, but instead to highlight the nuanced discrepancies or unforeseen parallels here between the two topics.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Answer:
What details are unclear. You want to find the answers within the text and realize your confusion.
Answer:it’s the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen! It’s a bananana next to a bananana
Explanation:
The Puritans generally wrote about religion, their experiences with other religions, and some other things, while revolutionary- era literature was more about freedom and opportunity.
Explanation:
Revolution literature spun more about reaching understanding ideas (such as human rights, government power, etc.). Puritan literature was intended to make people (religious or not) open their eyes to the world of crime and to deliver God more relevant in your normal life and make God more comprehensible.
