I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
Answer: discharge the contract
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Ruth contracts to provide Stan with fifty hours of telepathic personal coaching and that the state legislature subsequently passes a law making tele-pathic personal coaching illegal.
It should be noted that because of the law imposed by the legislature, the contract will be discharged. To discharge a contract simply means that the contract would be termination between Ruth and Stan. Such contract would cease to operate.
Answer:
because it will be for the betterment of the community, also it would make a diffreence by enforcing public laws to govern the community or country
Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority class action lawsuit that alleged public housing was serving de facto govt. segregation. -gave $ to families to help buy homes in suburbs. as a result, happier, healthier, children had higher test scores.
About case :
The case began in 1966, when Dorothy Gautreaux and others filed a class action claiming that the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) had intentionally perpetuated racial segregation both in its tenant assignment practices and in its siting policies. In 1969, the district court found for the plaintiff class, Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Auth.,
Who is Dorothy Gautreaux?
Dorothy Gautreaux was a community and civil rights activist who lived in public housing on Chicago's South Side, and fought against their unjust policies. Under the guidance of ACLU lawyers, Gautreaux and 3 other residents sued the Chicago Housing Authority in the nation's first public housing desegregation lawsuit.
Learn more about Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority :
brainly.com/question/28161937
#SPJ4
