It is limited in space that’s the only one I know
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Answer:
Option 3 is the answer - Do not have to be approved by the senate
Explanation:
In executive agreement, two or more heads of nations come together to form these agreements that are politically binding. They are not like treaties formally drafted as an international agreement or pact between sovereign states and international organisations that would require the advice and approvals of two-thirds of the senate before it can be effective (as seen in the U.S ).
Answer:
what is the question
please mark me as brainlist
thanks
Setting up a system of checks and balances