Answer:
932
Step-by-step explanation:
If they have 4 every hour, and there's 233 hours, you multiply 233 by 4.
If it was a 75% discount, then u r actually paying 25%
so....25% of the original price is $ 11
0.25x = 11
x = 11 / 0.25
x = 44 <=== the original price
Answer:
The slope of a line that has a y-intercept but no x-intercept will be zero.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the line has no x-intercept, then it never intersects the x-axis, so it must be parallel to the x-axis.
If a line does not have an x-intercept, it means it would never intersect the x-axis.
Thus, it must be parallel to the x-axis, meaning its slope will be zero. It would be just a horizontal line.
For example, y=9 is the line equation that does not have an x-intercept and its slope is zero.
Therefore, the slope of a line that has a y-intercept but no x-intercept will be zero.
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer:
21.70
Step-by-step explanation:
First find the discount
31 * 30%
31 *.30
9.3
Subtract from the original amount
31 - 9.3
21.70