As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
Answer:
The correct answer is A)The firm is technologically inefficient and also economically inefficient
Explanation:
It is technologically inefficient because it is using 12 units of capital to produce 100 units of output, when it could only use 8 units of capital to produce the same output. In other words, it is using more capital than it has to, and that is a sign of technological inefficiency.
It is also economically inefficient because it is pouring more money ($150) to produce output, than it has to ($120).
Greek tragedy is an extension of the ancient rites carried out in honor of Dionysus; it heavily influenced the theater of ancient Rome and the Renaissance. Tragic plots were often based upon myths from the oral traditions of archaic epics, and took the form of narratives presented by actors.
I need the text if I'm gonna help and I don't have enough point to communicate with you any other way
