Well..it will definitely hurt the consumer of the grass..but it wont hurt as much as it would the apex predator. So lets say a rabbit eats grass and then a snake eats the rabbit and an eagle eats the snake.....well because of the grass depletion that means some rabbits wont be able to eat meaning that some snakes wont be able to eat and that hurts the eagle the most because hes supposed to eat rabbits and snakes and now their both gone. hope i helped
It is a completely true statement that predictable <span>amounts of rainfall in each of the 4 seasons is an example of a pattern. The correct option among the two options that are given in the question is the first option. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has actually come to your help.</span>
These reactions require three ATP molecules. RuBP is thus regenerated to begin the cycle again. G3P produced by the Calvin cycle is the raw material used to synthesize glucose and other carbohydrates. The Calvin cycle uses 18 ATP and 12 NADPH molecules to produce one glucose molecule.
Answer: Here you go!
Explanation:
Doubling the amount of grass would definitely increase the rabbit population since there is more food/resources for it to produce. Since the food chain has a domino effect everything else would go up as well because of the increase of food/resources that will help sustain the population of all. so for the first line it would be increase for rabbit snake and hawk. Halving the amount of grass would effect the population of all animals as well. But in a more negative way. It would decrease because the rabbits wouldn't have enough food to produce and thrive. With the decline of rabbits less snakes will live because of the low amount of their main food source. Same with the eagles. So therefore it would be decrease in all the bottom lines.
