Joshua is currently consuming the optimal (utility-maximizing) quantities of tuna and ham when the price of tuna suddenly decreases. He will respond to this price change by increasing the consumption of tuna as his purchasing power will increase.
Whenever the price of a commodity is decreased, it increases the purchasing power of the consumer and hence the consumer will increase the demand of the goods as well. The consumer will be able to save more money as their expenses are reduced.
According to the law of demand and supply, demand and supply are related to each other and also affect the price of the commodity. The price tend to increase when the supply is lower than the demand and the price tend to increase when the supply exceeds the demand.
To learn more about purchasing power here
brainly.com/question/14892961
#SPJ4
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Its d. Impeachment, senate
Hope its correct and this helps u good luckkkk :)
<span>There is a decrease in fertility, which directly affects sexual desire and interest in one's partner/mate.</span>
Intermediate sanctions give a contrasting option to prison time and probation. Hence, they increment the judge's flexibility in punishing. A few sorts incorporate house capture, fines, checking, community service, and special living groups etc. Intermediate sanctions work better in many ways, like monitoring closely an offender can safeguard the community form an offender as well as can relate to the severity of the punishment of the offender. Another improvement can be the community service if ordered in that capacity.
