1. Santa Anna characterizes the mission of the Mexican Army as solely to liberate Texas from the rebels, thereby bringing to an end the independence declared by Texas from Mexico.
- However, the atrocities that Santa Anna visited against the Texans during the war show that the Mexican Army under his charge came to finish off the Texans. Many soldiers that fled the intensive fighting at Alamo were pursued and massacred.
2. The mission of the Mexican Army was characterized as that of liberation. This does not compare to José Enrique de la Peña's language.
- In de la Peña's account of the war, he stated that the American commanders were killed in the fighting. This account contradicted the fact that the commanders were massacred when they fled from the battleground.
3. The lengthy accounts of de Peña blame Santa Anna for the atrocities at Alamo and other battlegrounds.
- This conclusion is based on the fact that de Peña reported that Commander Davy Crockett did not die fighting but was ordered to be killed by Santa Anna after surrendering in battle.
Thus, these accounts show that evil transpired during the Texas War of Independence with Mexico between October 1835 to April 1836.
Read more about the Texas War at brainly.com/question/20716935
Answer:
export more than it imports
Explanation:
The colonial powers during the seventeenth century were led by the economic principles of the mercantilism. This economic principle was basically suggesting that in order for a country to gain as much wealth as possible, it needs to produce a lot, export more than it imports, and use protectionism as a defense mechanism. In order to accomplish this, the colonial powers engaged into mass production of goods that were in high demand and were sold for good price, resulting in creation of enormous plantations of cash crops. Some of the cash crops that contributed to accumulation of wealth through trade were the sugar cane, cotton, indigo, tobacco etc. Something else that this economic principle suggested was the creation or opening up of new markets, and the result of that was conquering new territories, where both the resources were used, and it was a new market for the products, though this came slightly later in the history.
Answer:
Battle of Gettysburg. Because, Pickett’s Charge was the culmination of the Battle of Gettysburg. Taking place on July 3, 1863.
Before embarking on the series of court cases that argued for his freedom, Scott’s life was the rootless existence typical of many slaves. Born around 1799 in Virginia, he moved with his owner Peter Blow to Alabama and eventually to St. Louis, where he was sold to U.S. Army Dr. John Emerson in the early 1830s.
Like many antebellum officers, Emerson was transferred from post to post through Western states and territories. During those journeys, Scott married a slave woman named Harriet Robinson in 1836. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott, by then the father of two children, likely hoped the doctor’s will would manumit him—and his family—but it did not. Scott then offered Emerson’s brother-in-law and executor, J.A. Sanford, $300 hoping to buy his own freedom. But the offer was turned down. Scott decided to take the matter to the courts.
By 1846, Scott was living in St. Louis in service to Emerson’s widow. He filed suit with the state of Missouri, claiming that since he had lived with Emerson in Illinois—where slavery was outlawed by the 1787 Northwest Ordinance—and Fort Snelling in Minnesota—where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in 1820—he was entitled to his freedom. In an interesting twist, the children of Peter Blow, Scott’s first owner, provided the slave family financial assistance.
