An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
Answer:
I think the type of paralleism is antithesis because two opposite ideas are put together in a sentence to achieve a contrasting effect.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Are you a christian?
Answer:
she still have the relationship with Barow ,she still loves him
Answer:
B). Explain how to avoid food poisoning from bacteria.
Explanation:
The key idea of the video transcripts from both Dr. X and the Quest for food safety is to 'inform the audience about the food poisoning and dangers associated with it and how it can be prevented by adopting appropriate methods of food safety.'
As per the question, the video 'elaborates how food poisoning from bacteria can be avoided.' It functions to enhance the readers' understanding of the concern and educate them about the '<u>proper preparation of foods to prevent cross contamination' which is the major cause of poisoning of food</u>. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
