Taken over by Protestants--Calvert allowed Protestants into the colony eventually leading to a take over.
Calvert wanted a Catholic state but also allowed Protestants access with religious toleration as the colonial rule. However, so many Protestants came to the colony eventually outnumbering the Catholics. As Protestants gained numbers they also gained power and control. They instituted laws against Catholics and they became target of violence and discrimination.
Answer:
Explanation:
Taking Country B as a comparison to the United States,
Country B -
1 barrel of oil = 7 hrs
1 ton of coal = 3 hrs
U.S. -
1 barrel of oil = 4 hrs
1 ton of coal = 5 hrs
Country B has the comparative advantage in coal production over US because it takes less time to produce 1 ton of coal. The opposite is true for oil production as US takes less time for 1 barrel of oil.
Availability and use of a natural resource give a country an advantage over another that does not. It takes less time with easily accessible national resource to produce something; such as oil and coal.
It makes you focus in on the bigger picture. HE HAD A DREAM. He wants to keep your attention focused on the bigger picture while also listing his other desires
Answer:
The correct answer would be D, they died to protect American democracy.
Explanation:
I hope this helps you! :)
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
