The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Political opponents of President John Adams opposed the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 because it stripped American citizens of the right to free speech, which blatantly violated the Constitution.
-increased advertisement studies and postings
-people want into debt to buy goods
-america was focused on the present and not the future
-all of these describes life in the 1920a
-credit to DrainHailey- ^^
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
each colony ensured that its citizens would be represented in the british parliament.
Answer:
An example showing someone's first amendment rights be violated is a college fraternity composed of close friends who share living quarters is forced to admit women.
Explanation:
