People were chained together.
People jumped into the sea to escape.
Some people were flogged unmercifully.
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
1. it created new jobs 2. It was an edvancement In tec. 3. They could hire young children and women for less and They made more money
More opportunities for American Indians Right to self-government;
Recognition of treaty rights
HOPE THIS HELPED!!! XD
False, north was the communist side of things, the United states got involved with the south to try to contain communism in Asia.
