1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melisa1 [442]
3 years ago
15

Describe the differences between the government’s early “civilization” and assimilation policies and its later removal policies.

How did the government’s attitude toward American Indians change over time?
History
1 answer:
netineya [11]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In the United States’ early years, the country’s leaders often seemed to support the idea of “civilizing” American Indians. They believed that tribes should give up their old culture in exchange for settlers’ culture and be encouraged to mix with white society. This meant that tribes should be encouraged to wear Western clothing, learn English, and adopt Western foods and economic activities. Later, many leaders like Andrew Jackson began to pursue a policy of removal. They believed that, rather than encouraging tribes to assimilate, the government should simply take tribes off land that settlers desired. Tribes should be moved to the West, where they could be kept away from new settlements and towns.

Explanation:

response on edg.

You might be interested in
What was Polk’s margin of victory in the electoral college?
White raven [17]
Polk’s margin of victory was approximately 1.4 percent. :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the homestead act and its stipulations?
Tanya [424]
It encouraged western migration by providing settlers 160 acres of public land. In exchange homesteaders paid a small filing fee and were required to complete 5 years of continuous rescidence before ownership of new land
8 0
3 years ago
What are some mindblowing theories youve heard
QveST [7]

- The Existence of White Holes

Everyone knows about black holes and how their immense gravity sucks in everything around them, including light. But what about white holes? Theoretically, they’re the exact opposite of a black hole and instead of sucking in matter they spit it out.

8 0
3 years ago
Hey do y'all know charlie charlie yes or no
Harman [31]

Answer:

Yea

Explanation:

Yea isn’t it. A folklore/creepy pasta

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the dissent, Black argues that, after the Court's decision, students everywhere will: A. want to fight in Vietnam. B. challen
mart [117]
Yo it's C. Fight all their teachers orders. Trust me
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The immigration act of 1924 produced highly discriminatory results because it
    12·1 answer
  • The Erie Canal________________.a. was far longer than any other canal in the United States at that time.b. attracted an influx o
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Third Amendment important to the framers?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did stock prices drop so quickly in 1929?
    7·2 answers
  • This is science but i cant find a science subject on here.
    15·1 answer
  • In Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, states are forbidden from keeping a standing army or navy. Why would the Constitution restri
    6·1 answer
  • The United Nations has two main tasks:
    6·2 answers
  • Explain why there were changes in the prison system in the period c1700–c1900.
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Helpp plssssssssss plsss
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!