1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
3 years ago
12

Which group is allowed to unionize but NOT strike?

History
2 answers:
Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. federal employees

Explanation:

EDGE 2021

erma4kov [3.2K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. federal employees

Explanation:

Federal employees are allowed to unionize so that they can negotiate working conditions and have a stronger standing position before the federal government when it comes to protecting their rights.

However, they are not allowed to strike because federal workers provide a service that is considered too vital to be interrupted under any circumstance. This is why people like FBI agents, or US Army marines, can unionize, but never go on strike.

You might be interested in
French Revolution was an uprising of the French people against the monarchy and government (1789–1799)
jasenka [17]

Answer:

May 5, 1789 – November 9, 1799

True

7 0
3 years ago
After World War II, the U.S. government loaned and granted money to needy countries in Europe in the hopes of promoting democrac
Grace [21]
The program that is described above was an example of foreign aid. The correct answer is D. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which right does Article I, Section 11 of the Washington State Constitution protect?
frosja888 [35]
Your answer is freedom of rely
5 0
3 years ago
What form of government in Russia, Italy and Germany during the first half of the twentieth century was
Oxana [17]
A dictatorship/communism.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1. Two people have an argument. You hear two versions of what happened, one from one of the participants and the other from a fr
    11·1 answer
  • How did Western Christians respond to Pope Urban II calling on them to recapture the
    5·1 answer
  • All Dakota took part in the fighting. Question 2 options: True False
    6·1 answer
  • In the 1819 case involving James McCulloch, the state further decreed that the bank needed to pay $15,000 annually to Maryland,
    8·1 answer
  • What was Camillo Cavour's long-<br> term goal as prime minister?
    9·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast: Using complete sentences, explain at least three differences between communism and democracy as political
    9·1 answer
  • What group was negatively affected by the Land Ordinance of 1785?
    5·2 answers
  • I need help making an acrostic poem about CONVENTION (Constitutional Convention)
    8·1 answer
  • What was a belief of the federalist party
    5·1 answer
  • HELP I'LL MARK BRAINLIEST!!<br>​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!