1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fynjy0 [20]
3 years ago
13

What is the volume, in cubic centimeters, of a rectangular prism with a height of 7 centimeters, a width of 6 centimeters, and a

length of 14 centimeters?
Mathematics
2 answers:
aniked [119]3 years ago
7 0

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 7,6,14

=588

therefore the answer in cubic centimeters is= 588

nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

588

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply length x width x height 7×6×14

You might be interested in
Hellpppppppppppppppppp
Nikolay [14]

Answer:

9 + (-6)

Step-by-step explanation:

9-6=3

9 + (-6)= 3

Hope it will help you

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is 0.9999 Equal to 1 again?
DochEvi [55]
It’s not exactly equal to one, but in many cases in math they ask for a rounded answer.
3 0
4 years ago
Ginny is studying a population of frogs. She determines that the population is decreasing at an average rate of 3% per year. Whe
Rama09 [41]

You can see how this works by thinking through what's going on.

 

In the first year the population declines by 3%.  So the population at the end of the first year is the starting population (1200) minus the decline: 1200 minus 3% of 1200.  3% of 1200 is the same as .03 * 1200.  So the population at the end of the first year is 1200 - .03 * 1200.  That can be written as 1200 * (1 - .03), or 1200 * 0.97

 

What about the second year?  The population starts at 1200 * 0.97.  It declines by 3% again.  But 3% of what???  The decline is based on the population at the beginning of the year, NOT based no the original population.  So the decline in the second year is 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97).  And just as in the first year, the population at the end of the second year is the population at the beginning of the second year minus the decline in the second year.  So that's 1200 * 0.97 - 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97), which is equal to 1200 * 0.97 (1 - 0.03) = 1200 * 0.97 * 0.97 = 1200 * 0.972.

 

So there's a pattern.  If you worked out the third year, you'd see that the population ends up as 1200 * 0.973, and it would keep going like that.

 

So the population after x years is 1200 * 0.97x

5 0
4 years ago
A. Evaluate the polynomial
sdas [7]

Answer:

a) y = x³− 5x² + 6x + 0.55 at x = 1.37.

Use 3-digit arithmetic with chopping. Evaluate the percent relative round-off error.

-1.183%

b. Express y as y = ((x − 5)x + 6)x + 0.55 (this is the same equation). Use again 3-digit arithmetic with chopping. Evaluate the percent relative round-off error and compare with part (a). Make the conclusion about which form of the polynomial is superior.

-0.161%

Comparing part a and b together, part b is more superior because the percent(%) error is smaller when compared to part a

Step-by-step explanation:

a) y = x³− 5x² + 6x + 0.55 at x = 1.37.

Use 3-digit arithmetic with chopping. Evaluate the percent relative round-off error.

Let's evaluate before applying the 3 digit arithmetic chopping rule

y = 1.37³ - 5 × 1.37² + 6 × 1.37 + 0.55

y = 1.956853

Let evaluate each components of the polynomial one by one

Note that: 3-digit arithmetic chopping means to approximate chop off or remove number after the 3 significant figures.

y = x³− 5x² + 6x + 0.55 at x = 1.37.

x³ = 1.37³ = 2.571353

≈ 2.57

x² = 1.37² = 1.8769

≈ 1.88

5x² = 1.87 × 5

= 9.35

x = 1.37

6x = 1.37 × 6

6x = 8.22

Evaluating the polynomial

y = 2.57 - 9.38 + 8.22 + 0.55

y = 1.98

The percent relative round-off error =

1.956853 - 1.98/1.956853 × 100

= -1.183%

b. Express y as y = ((x − 5)x + 6)x + 0.55 (this is the same equation). Use again 3-digit arithmetic with chopping. Evaluate the percent relative round-off error and compare with part (a). Make the conclusion about which form of the polynomial is superior.

y = ((x − 5)x + 6)x + 0.55

Evaluating with the 3 digit chop off rule is applied

= ((1.37 - 5)1.37 + 6)1.37 + 0.55

=( 1.8769 - 6.85) + 6) 1.37 + 0.55

= (- 4.9731 + 6 )1.37 + 0.55

= 1.0269 × 1.37 + 0.55

= 1.406853

= 1.956853.

≈ 1.96

Note in: evaluating before applying the 3 digit arithmetic chopping rule

y = 1.37³ - 5 × 1.37² + 6 × 1.37 + 0.55

y = 1.956853

The percent relative round-off error

1.956853 - 1.96/1.956853 × 100

= -0.161%

Comparing part a and b together, part b is more superior because the percent(%) error is smaller when compared to part a

3 0
4 years ago
1/12 minus what equals 3/4
Alex

Answer:-2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the domain and range of f(x) =4^x-8
    12·1 answer
  • The total cost for a bucket of popcorn and 4 movie tickets is $56. The total cost for the same size bucket of popcorn and 6 movi
    14·1 answer
  • If an item
    13·1 answer
  • Please help with remaining and/or correct what I have
    9·1 answer
  • Find the missing number.<br> 48/6 = ?/24
    14·1 answer
  • 6sacks of potatoes weigh 122.4 kg and 4 sacks of onions weigh 50 kg. What is the total amount of 1 sack of potatoes and 1 sack o
    10·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression given below.<br><br><br><br> A. <br><br> B. <br><br> C. <br><br> D.
    7·1 answer
  • (b) 1-5 P<br> W<br> I=0+90/1<br> 081=1+0S..<br> 65°<br> f<br> O<br> 32°<br> (c)<br> POE<br> R
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a random sample of the population of people who subscribe to a particular magazine?
    12·2 answers
  • A coin is tossed and a die is rolled simultaneously. What is the probability of getting a head and a number less than 3?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!