Answer:
D Femmist theory This is the both of the answer
A Radical theory
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Yes because 158,000 is a lot of money if u think abt it it’s a good amount it will pay ur debts and everything else u need
Answer: A. 500 feet of oncoming
Explanation:
