Can anyone please please help me with this
2 answers:
You might be interested in
3.
m/_QOR + m/_ROS = 90 (because the two angels together make a right angle)
Substitute.
x + 5 + 2x + 7 = 90
3x + 12 = 90
-12 -12
subtract 12 from both sides
3x = 78
Divide each side by 3 to get x by itself
x = 26
4. those two angles in the picture are vertical, which means they're congruent.
with that in mind...the ray makes a right angle on one and the other, w, you dont know. so to get the whole angle you need to add both angles to get the whole thing so...
m/_w + 90 = 125
subtract 90 on both sides
m/_w = 35
m/_QOR + m/_ROS = 90 (because the two angels together make a right angle)
Substitute.
x + 5 + 2x + 7 = 90
3x + 12 = 90
-12 -12
subtract 12 from both sides
3x = 78
Divide each side by 3 to get x by itself
x = 26
4. those two angles in the picture are vertical, which means they're congruent.
with that in mind...the ray makes a right angle on one and the other, w, you dont know. so to get the whole angle you need to add both angles to get the whole thing so...
m/_w + 90 = 125
subtract 90 on both sides
m/_w = 35
Answer:
Yes, it can be concluded that the mean hexane concentration is less in treated water than in unsaturated water
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of of specimen in the samples of untreated water, n₁ = 16
The sample mean, = 228.0
The sample standard deviation, s₁ = 4.3
The number of of specimen in the samples of treated water, n₂ = 20
The sample mean, = 224.6
The sample standard deviation, s₂ = 5.0
The level of significance = 0.10
The null hypothesis, H₀; ≥
The alternative hypothesis, Hₐ; <
The degrees of freedom = 16 - 1 = 15
The test statistic, = 1.341
Plugging in the values, we get;
Given that the t-value is large, the corresponding p-value is low, therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and there is considerable statistical evidence to suggest that the mean hexane concentration is less in treated than in untreated water, therefore, we have; ≥