Answer:
$937.50 Gain
Explanation:
The computation of the gain or loss is shown below:
= (Future contract per pound - appreciated value per pound) × amount of each pounds future contract
= ($1.4400 - $1.4250) × £62,500
= $0.0150 × £62,500
= $937.50 Gain
We simply deduct the appreciated value per pound from the future contract per pound and multiply it with the future contract amount so that the accurate value can come.
Answer:
Commercial General Liability Policy will not provide compensation for injured caused by softball to the Director
Explanation:
Commercial General Liability (CGL) is an insurance policy that provide protection and assurance to a business organisation against any legal liability arising from the use of its property, while in the premises of the insured, from use of product.
The Commercial General Liability provides the coverage below:
-Liability arising from Bodily injury and property damage
-Liability arising from Personal and advertising injury and Medical payments
In this director scenario, the CGL have in its provision and condition to provide compensation for the injury caused as a result of their actions (e.g. building collapse, left broken bottles, bad product which directly affected third party) but the director was injured by his own accompanied property and have no relation whatsoever with the Land company. Hence no indemnity or compensation will be provided under the Commercial General Liability Policy.
Answer:
lower; stronger
Explanation:
Purchasing power parity (PPP) is a theory where the exchange rates of the states that lies between the currencies should be in equilibrium
Also their purchasing power should be similar in each and every of the two countries
So as per the purchasing power parity when the inflation rate of domestic one should be less as compared to the foreign country so the domestic currency should be stronger as compared to the foreign country
He may be liable for<u> "damages, fines, or imprisonment."</u>
Copyright law does not contain any proviso that enables unapproved gatherings to make individual duplicates of copyrighted items. Be that as it may, under the teaching of "reasonable utilize," people might be allowed to make reinforcement duplicates or authentic duplicates of a few materials as long as specific conditions are met. Making a duplicate of a copyrighted work for your very own usability is probably going to be considered copyright encroachment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are making a duplicate so you may utilize a copyrighted item on the off chance that the first is stolen, harmed or devastated, your direct may fall inside the teaching of reasonable utilize.