Answer:
Width = 4 m
Length = 7 m
Step-by-step explanation:
given:
perimeter of a rectangle = 22m
L = 3 + W
perimeter = 2L + 2W
perimeter = 2 (3 + W) + 2W
22 = 6 + 2W + 2W
22 - 6 = 4W
W = 16 / 4
W = 4 m
L = 3 + W
L = 3 + 4
L = 7 m
check:
perimeter = 2L + 2W
22 = 2(7) + 2(4)
22 = 14 + 8
22 = 22 ---- OK
Answer:
The scale factor is 18 to 1 for the painting
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we want to get the scale factor of the original to what is reproduced
Let us have same units first
Mathematically;
1 foot = 12 inches
3 feet = 36 inches
2 feet = 24 inches
So 36 to 2 and 24 to 1 1/3
That will be ratio 36/2 = 18 to 1
same as 25 divided by 1 1/3 = 18 to 1
45% is the answer, since u have to multiply the 3% by 15
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
