Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.
Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide
Answer:
I think it might be A but not sure
Explanation:
No i would not recommend going to court because i'm sure if he has the money to get a lawyer then he should have the money to replace his damaged goods
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
I can't understand your question please explain
WeltyTrafficStops.pdf
if you search this up, the first link might help.
