1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
2 years ago
7

I need 5 claims against gun control laws.

Law
2 answers:
djyliett [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1. we already have laws

2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)

3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun

4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)

5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc

Explanation:

for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.

Marizza181 [45]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. shootings are still happening in areas where guns are banned

2. Limiting firearms also limits the people's Second Amendment rights.

3. people known as shooters will still get access to guns even with gun laws in place.

4. Controlling guns won't control stop them.

5. People that are armed help take out bad guys.

6. People use guns as self defence.

Explanation:

oof, ive never go against gun control laws but here we go..

1. shootings are still happening in areas where guns are banned

2. Limiting firearms also limits the people's Second Amendment rights.

3. people known as shooters will still get access to guns even with gun laws in place.

4. Controlling guns won't control stop them.

5. People that are armed help take out bad guys.

6. People use guns as self defence.

Hope this helps you.

You might be interested in
Gender Equality at workplace
KatRina [158]
Whats your question ?
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I don’t know the difference about political rights or anything like that but I want to say soemthing about the human rights and
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

???

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Sylvester leaves the chemical factory at the end of a day’s work. He is approximately 500 m away from the gates when a series of
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

it's weird ... why did it exploded when he got outside ... it's fishy .. he is lying surely he knows about this explosion and he is just telling half story ... we should emotionally manipulate him

8 0
2 years ago
Will the interaction of the current through the loop with the magnetic field cause the loop to rotate?
blondinia [14]

Answer:

Yes, it will.

Explanation:

Using Flemings right hand rule, where the forefinger points to the direction of the magnetic field, the middle finger points in the direction of the current and the thumb gives the direction of force or motion acting on the conductor. One can observe from the attached image  that the force on both sides of the ring pull the ring out, which increases the angle. Therefore,  the net torque acting on the loop is positive and tends to rotate the loop in the direction of increasing angle θ (counterclockwise).

8 0
2 years ago
What are the requirements of a criminal conspiracy? Provide an example of a conspiracy and explain how it meets the definition.
damaskus [11]

Answer:

Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.

Explanation:

Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Individual characteristics can be associated with multiple sources and are always found at crime scenes.
    14·1 answer
  • The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 guarantees certain employees unpaid leave during a family medical emergency.
    8·1 answer
  • Name the ways in which a court order can compel specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract?
    7·1 answer
  • Uh i dont know any of these questions
    8·2 answers
  • Dn3rlwdnwqbfy3evfs deubfiwbfweviuebuevyibujbkhvyguhnjkbh
    12·2 answers
  • Why do you think it is so important that financial records are maintained well? What would be a potential negative consequence b
    8·1 answer
  • How does a stipulation work?​
    9·1 answer
  • Why is monitoring a major part of the work of the probation and parole officers?
    15·1 answer
  • How Do I Poop in my pants?
    9·2 answers
  • 56 points easy. !!!!?????
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!