The correct answer is; Methylated and nonmethylated strains should be maintained among both bacteria and bacteriophages, with ratios that vary over time. Restriction enzyme are protein produced by bacteria that cleaves DNA at specific sites along the molecule. In bacterial cell, restriction enzymes cleave foreign DNA, thus eliminating infecting organisms.
The answer is the second one since biotechnology is used with GMO's (genetically mutated organisms)
Really, there are multiple questions all rolled into one.I will try to answer them patiently and systematically.
First summarize data.
A. Neither Olivia nor Marcus have freckles (recessive, ff)
B. Both are heterozygous for the hairline trait (dominant Ww)
C. Neither Marcus nor Olivia can roll their tongues (rr).
D. All four children have dimples (dominant Dx)
E. Both Olivia and Marcus are EE (unattached earlobe trait).
F. Marcus can not detect the bitter taste (pp for PTC gene)Olivia has been found to be able to detect the bitter taste, but she is heterozygous for the trait. (Pp for PTC gene)
A. Freckles, F (Dominant)
"Neither Olivia nor Marcus have freckles" =>
both have genotype ff.
None of the children have freckles (i.e. P(F)=0% for freckles in all children)
B. Widow's Peak, W (dominant)
"Both are heterozygous for the hairline trait"
So both have genotype Ww.
Punnett square
W w
W WW Ww
w Ww ww
Since W is a dominant trait, only ww (25%) will have straight hairline, 75% will inherit the widow's peak.
50% of the children will be homozygous (Ww).
C. Rolling tongues, R (dominant)
"Neither Marcus nor Olivia can roll their tongues"
means that both are homozygous recessive, with genotype rr.As in freckles, all children will have genotype rr, so none of them will roll their tongues.
None will be heterozygous. The whole family's genotype is rr.
D. Dimples, D (dominant)
"D. All four children have dimples"
implies that all children have genotype DD or Dd.
It is likely that at least one parent has genotype DD in order to have 100% of children have DD or Dd.Here are some possibilities
Case 1: DD + DD (both homoozygous dominant)
D D
D DD DD
D DD DD
Phenotype: 100% have dimples
Case 2: DD + Dd (one homoozygous dominant, and other heterozygous)
D d
D DD Dd
D DD Dd
Phenotype: 100% have dimples
Case 3: DD + dd (one homoozygous dominant, and other homozygous recessive)
D D
D DD DD
d Dd Dd
Phenotype: 100% have dimples
Case 4: Dd + Dd (both heterozygous)
D d
D DD Dd
d Dd dd
Phenotype: 75% have dimples, 25 do not.Note: all 4 children could have dimples, with probability 31.6%
Case 5: Dd + dd (Heterozygous + homozygous recessive)
D d
d Dd dd
d Dd dd
Phenotype: 50% have dimples, 50 do not.Note: All four children could have dimples, with probability 6.25%.
Case 6: dd + dd (Both homozygous recessive)
D d
d dd dd
d dd dd
Phenotype: all children have no dimples.
Conclusion:Likely genotypes of parents: DD+DD, DD+Dd, DD+dd
Possible genotypes of parents: Dd+Dd, Dd+dd
Impossible genotype of parents: dd+dd
Therefore we know with certainty that at least one of the parents has dimples.
E. Unattached Earlobe trait, E (dominant)
"Both Olivia and Marcus are EE"
(i.e. unattached earlobe trait).
This means that the whole family will have genotype EE, i.e. all are homozygous dominant, and have unattached earlobes.
F. Bitter taste, P (incomplete dominance)
"Marcus can not detect the bitter taste (pp for PTC gene)
Olivia has been found to be able to detect the bitter taste, but she is heterozygous for the trait. (Pp)"
P p
p Pp pp
p Pp pp
Probability for each single child being able to taste the ptc paper is 1/2.
Probability for all children being able to taste the ptc paper is (1/2)^4=1/16.
If Violet cannot taste the ptc paper, her genotype is pp.
We do not know for sure how many of the children can taste the ptc paper.
The most like situation is only half of them can taste, so do the parents. Therefore, half of the family can taste the ptc paper.
Finally, as to "please answer it correctly", I believe I did. :)
Answer:
A. They contain their own DNA
Explanation:
Mitochondria is a eukaryotic cellular organelle which is thought to be evolved by the symbiotic relationship between the prokaryotes and the proto-eukaryotes.
The mitochondria were once a free-living prokaryote which during the course of evolution was engulfed by the proto-eukaryote. They formed the symbiotic relationship with each other and the prokaryote evolved into the mitochondria.
There are many pieces of evidence which suggest the endosymbiotic hypothesis one of which is provided in the option is that they contain their own DNA just like the prokaryotes that is one circular DNA present in their cytoplasm not enclosed by the
Thus, Option-A is correct.