Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Organizational expense amortized over fifteen years for purposes of determining taxable income results in an upper adjustment in the initial years to book income on the Schedule Minus−1 when the expense is being amortized over ten years for book income purposes.
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
Following are the responses to the given question:
Explanation:
For question 1:
Calculating the cost per unit:

For question 2:
Calculating the ending inventory units:
Calculating the cost for the Ending inventory:

For question 3:
Calculating the absorption costing for the income statement:
Particular Amount
Sales
-COGS
Gross profit
Cost of variable marketing
marketing and administrative costs are fixed
Net income 
Here u go this is really helpful I just had this question yw
Answer:
Attached grap with point A and B.
Explanation:
Russia will produce the cars as their production has te lower opportunity cost:
(Note: Opportunity cost is the amount of production resigned for the current output)
<u>Sweden pportunity cost for production car: </u>
25 ton of papper / 5 m cars = 5 tons per millon of cars
<u>Russia pportunity cost for production car: </u>
8 ton of papper / 4 m cars = 2 tons per millon of cars
With the trade set at 2 millon car for 6 tons of paper we get the following
Sweden produce 25 tons - 6 traded = 19
and receive 2 millon car
Russia produce 4 millon car - 2 traded = 2
and receive 6 tons of pappers