A. used the attack to justify taking aggressive action against Serbia
Explanation:
Austria-Hungary sent them an ultimatum to Serbia, and Serbia agreed to most of it but the only part it didn't agree to was that Austria-Hungary was able to do an investigation of who did the assassination in which Serbia refused for Austria-Hungary to investigate. This then went to the German's in which they backed Austria-Hungary for being an ally in the war which then led to the out-break of world war 1.
Correct answer is A. used the attack to justify taking aggressive action against Serbia
.
Explanation:
Option A is correct because after the assassination on June 28th 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia on July 28th, starting a great offensive on its western and northern boundaries.
B is not correct as Ottomans entered the war in later stage, and Serbia was not their territory.
C is not correct as Germany stayed on the side of Austria-Hungary.
D is not correct as Triple Entente fought against Austria-Hungary in this war.
The relationship between the principle of Separation of Powers and the Articles of confederation can be accurately described by the statement: b<span>ecause the Articles of Confederation created a central government that contained only a legislative branch, it does not reflect the principle of "separation of powers".</span>
I feel like this is more of a question based on personal opinions but here is mine
Explanation:
I think that yes it was worth it because without that war many more Jews would have been killed and who knows what Hitler would have done next if he succeeded and killed all the Jews.
Even though they could not hold public office, creoles were the least oppressed of those born in Latin America. They were the best educated, many traveling to Europe for their education. Meaning, their skill outnumbered many.
John Locke, an English philosopher and physician, is regarded as one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers, whose work greatly contributed to the development of the notions of social contract and natural rights.
