Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
It can create more jobs
It could also potentially make another super continent someday
Answer:
The correct answer is: Manuscript.
Explanation:
A manuscript is a type of speech delivery in which the speaker has to read what he/she has previously written on paper.
<u>Manuscript</u><u> deliveries are usually done in public speaking settings when the information has to be delivered in a precise manner by the speaker. </u>
<u>The upside of manuscript deliveries is that if the speaker uses this type of speech delivery he/she won't miss any fact or a bit of information.</u>
In this particular case, a political candidate is running for office and must give a speech that will lay out the details of her platform. The speech will be widely covered by newspapers and television. The method of delivery that the candidate is most likely to use is: Manuscript.
Answer: Explanation:
Ignacio de Loyola was the founder of the Catholic order Society of Jesus , the members were called Jesuits . His perception of how God interacted with humanity in this world is directly , specially with those who are receptive to God´s guidance. He presented some ideas as how people in general, not only the monks, could <em>exame themselves, and thus have a </em><em>personal relatioship with God.</em>
