Answer:
Law 2
Explanation:
In probability. As bigger the group we are trying to predict , the higher probability to be more accurate
Answer:
Allison should record the purchase at $5880
Explanation:
The net method for recording purchases implies that the purchases is recorded net of the envisaged cash discount on the transaction since the purchaser believes they would settle their account before the cash discount period expires.
Based on the above, the purchases would be recorded as shown below:
cost of purchase=original purchase value*(100%-discount rate)
original purchase price is $6,000
discount rate is 2%
cost of purchase=$6000*(100%-2%)
=$6000*98%
=$5880
Answer: fall; decrease
Explanation:
People save in order to be able to consume in future. If it is discovered that there will be no fixture, there would be no need to save. The supply of loanable funds would therefore decrease as people stopped saving.
Because there is reduced loanable funds, less investments would be done as these require loanable funds. With less investments being done, the economic output will decrease.
Answer:
<em>d. adjourning
</em>
Explanation:
A group's <em>disbanding is called the adjourning phase</em>. The adjournment stage, created by Bruce Tuckman in 1977, is the fifth and final phase of group creation that takes place whenever a team concludes its work and then dissolves.
At around this point, it is crucial that team members get sufficient resolution and appreciation for the work they've done.
Remember that not all groups are going through a period of adjournment. If the team remains together for future projects, the adjournment stage of group growth would not go through.
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Promissory estoppel means that in legal tenet that a promise or pledge can be enforced by law, actually if formulated without legal consideration, if the George now the (promisor) has made a pledge to a Susy the (promises) who then depends on that promise for a subsequent detriment. So what Promissory estoppel is expected to do is to stop the (George) promisor from insisting that an underlying promise should not be legally authorized or implemented. So Susy can sue George on the basis of promissory estoppel and get a reward for George's disappointment
