1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valina [46]
3 years ago
15

Discuss THREE ways in which the British Caribbean planters attempted to control the economic activities of enslaved men and wome

n
History
1 answer:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

After the Caribbean was first colonised by Spain in the 15th century, a system of sugar planting and enslavement evolved. David Lambert explores how this system changed the region, and how enslaved people continued to resist colonial rule.

Along with a number of colonies in North America, the Caribbean formed the heart of England’s first overseas empire. The region was also known as the ‘West Indies’ because when the explorer Christopher Columbus first arrived there in 1492, he believed that he had sailed to the ‘Indies’, as Asia was then known. At the time, Europeans did not realise that this was a completely new part of the world that we now call the Americas. It is also for this reason that people who lived in this part of the world before the Europeans arrived have been called ‘Indians’.

Columbus claimed many of the Caribbean islands for Spain. For much of the 16th century, Spain had things pretty much its own way in the region. From the early 17th century, however, people from other European powers, including France and England, settled in the region too. (Strictly speaking, it is not correct  to talk about ‘Britain’ until after 1707, when England and Scotland formed a union.) The English settled St Kitts in 1624, Barbados, Montserrat and Antigua in 1627 and Nevis in 1628. Around the same time, France established colonies in Martinique and Guadeloupe. In this way, the Caribbean came under the control of a number of competing European countries, joining Spain, which had established its first colonies in the region more than a hundred years before.

You might be interested in
What was one development in education policy during the 20th and 21st centuries
Inessa05 [86]

Answer:

The answer is letter A, the federal government became increasingly involved in education.

Explanation:

It was during the 20th and the 21st century that <em>education was considered significant in the country's national development. </em>This resulted to the federal government's involvement in increasing the literacy rate of the nation. They ensured that efficient and practical outcomes would prosper. It was followed by the <u>construction of many school</u>s and the<u> development of curicculum. </u>

The government also included <u>"vocational training"</u> in order to improve the skills of the people. Several arrangements were done in order to have an effective school system.

Thus, this explains the answer, letter A.

6 0
3 years ago
Helppppp
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
The answer is
D. Socrates
6 0
3 years ago
Can anyone please help this is due tomorrow
pshichka [43]

The difference between the two excerpts is that one shows men who are happy to have won and the other shows men wallowing in defeat.

<h3>What do the excerpts show?</h3>

One excerpt shows how happy the Allied soldiers were to have won the First World War.

The other shows how disappointed and in anguish the Germans were from losing the war to the Triple Entente.

Find out more on the Triple Entente at brainly.com/question/673841.

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Which of these BEST describes the events leading up the United States' involvement in World War I? A) The government took part i
Lyrx [107]
D) American citizens wanted to stay neutral until the innocent were killed.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the price of copper rises, which of the following may occur?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

The correct option is B, the profits of copper produces increase

Explanation:

Assuming copper is price inelastic, meaning the rise in price would not impact the quantity demanded significantly, the revenue of the suppliers increase and as a result the bottom-line( profits) recorded by the suppliers increase.

A price increase cannot bring about reduction in quantity supplied ads increase in price is an incentive to supply more, hence option A is wrong.

Option C is totally out of context as well as option D

The government is not the one producing the copper let alone increase the content of the copper

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who were the 2 superpower countries involved in the cold war?
    8·1 answer
  • What european nation led the way in exploration of the new worlds of north and south america?
    6·1 answer
  • Why were mandela tutu and Biko most important?
    9·1 answer
  • How was world war 1 impact on russia similar to its impact on germany ?
    13·1 answer
  • while the countries of western Europe were changed by the French Revolution, how much did Russia change ?​
    14·1 answer
  • Do you consider DE LAS CASAS to be A relatable source? why or why not.
    5·1 answer
  • Which are considered to be weaknesses of the Articles of Federation?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statements describe Genghis Khan?<br> (Choose 2)
    10·2 answers
  • Who had to pay the debt from the French and Indian war?​
    10·1 answer
  • 2
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!