Answer:
stare decisis
Explanation:
In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.
Answer: a stronger Federal government
Explanation:
The Federalists<span> felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the </span>Constitution<span> as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- </span>Federalists<span> claimed the</span>Constitution<span> gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression
source:</span>https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjAnvaMvLbR...
Answer:
<h3>Individualistic fallacy.</h3>
Explanation:
Individualistic fallacy is one among the five fallacies people should avoid when they think about racial denomination. According to Desmond and Emirbayer, it is an <u>individualistic fallacy</u> to think of racism as being only about ideas and prejudices.
In this fallacy, racism is seen as something that emerges from ideas and prejudices. People with this fallacy think that racism is the collection of hateful and prejudiced thoughts that racist individuals have for other groups of people. However, people with this fallacy does not consider the intentionality of a racial act. They think all racial acts are hateful and nasty.
Therefore, Desmond and Emirbayer try to establish that racism is not only about intentional thoughts and actions but it also includes unintentional thoughts and habits that social institutions have implanted.
Answer:
I think it's B if not then we have different answers
Explanation:
