Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

10

What is the meaning of these words? I cannot preach with featherlight tongue, of the things I haven't lived. I lack the wisdom a

nd experience, that only the years and life, can teach.

1 answer:

Klio2033 [76]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

no puedes hablar de un tema que nunca has vivido,tendrias que vivir esa experiencia para entenderlo

You might be interested in

Read this line from Frankenstein by Mary Shelley:

VMariaS [17]

"<span>Calmness: peacefulness: Free Dictionary" is the one definition of tranquility among the following that is most likely suited for this line. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or the fourth option. I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Does someone have written film analysis???it can be any film. Help me it's due today.

Ilya [14]

Answer:

Alex Garland’s 2015 science fiction film Ex Machina follows a young programmer’s attempts to determine whether or not an android possesses a consciousness complicated enough to pass as human. The film is celebrated for its thought-provoking depiction of the anxiety over whether a nonhuman entity could mimic or exceed human abilities, but analyzing the early sections of the film, before artificial intelligence is even introduced, reveals a compelling examination of humans’ inability to articulate their thoughts and feelings. In its opening sequence, Ex Machina establishes that it’s not only about the difficulty of creating a machine that can effectively talk to humans, but about human beings who struggle to find ways to communicate with each other in an increasingly digital world.

The piece's opening introduces the film with a plot summary that doesn't give away too much and a brief summary of the critical conversation that has centered around the film. Then, however, it deviates from this conversation by suggesting that Ex Machina has things to say about humanity before non-human characters even appear. Off to a great start.

The film’s first establishing shots set the action in a busy modern office. A woman sits at a computer, absorbed in her screen. The camera looks at her through a glass wall, one of many in the shot. The reflections of passersby reflected in the glass and the workspace’s dim blue light make it difficult to determine how many rooms are depicted. The camera cuts to a few different young men typing on their phones, their bodies partially concealed both by people walking between them and the camera and by the stylized modern furniture that surrounds them. The fourth shot peeks over a computer monitor at a blonde man working with headphones in. A slight zoom toward his face suggests that this is an important character, and the cut to a point-of-view shot looking at his computer screen confirms this. We later learn that this is Caleb Smith (Domhnall Gleeson), a young programmer whose perspective the film follows.

The rest of the sequence cuts between shots from Caleb’s P.O.V. and reaction shots of his face, as he receives and processes the news that he has won first prize in a staff competition. Shocked, Caleb dives for his cellphone and texts several people the news. Several people immediately respond with congratulatory messages, and after a moment the woman from the opening shot runs in to give him a hug. At this point, the other people in the room look up, smile, and start clapping, while Caleb smiles disbelievingly—perhaps even anxiously—and the camera subtly zooms in a bit closer. Throughout the entire sequence, there is no sound other than ambient electronic music that gets slightly louder and more textured as the sequence progresses. A jump cut to an aerial view of a glacial landscape ends the sequence and indicates that Caleb is very quickly transported into a very unfamiliar setting, implying that he will have difficulty adjusting to this sudden change in circumstances.

These paragraphs are mostly descriptive. They give readers the information they will need to understand the argument the piece is about to offer. While passages like this can risk becoming boring if they dwell on unimportant details, the author wisely limits herself to two paragraphs and maintains a driving pace through her prose style choices (like an almost exclusive reliance on active verbs).

8 0

3 years ago

Which sentence summarizes what the author says can be done with uneaten food?

Blizzard [7]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Underline the verb in each sentence. On the blank, write the tense of the verb.

exis [7]

Answer:

1. The film house <u>has</u> not <u>developed</u> the pictures yet.

2. Fred<u> </u><u>will have left </u>before Erin's arrival.

3. Florence <u>has been</u> a very gracious hostess.

4. Andi <u>had lost </u>her transfer by the end of the bus ride.

5. By tonight, I <u>will have finished</u> my assignment.

6. Before the discovery of the buried chest, joe <u>had</u> not <u>believed </u>in buried treasure.

7. We <u>have worked</u><u> </u>over an hour on one math problem.

8. Until his college years, Carl <u>had </u>not <u>decided</u> on his career.

9. The snow plows <u>had cleared</u> our street before the really heavy snow.

10. <u>Have</u> the Ortons <u>found</u> their dog yet?

Explanation:

1. Has is the auxiliary verb in the sentence while developed is a past participle. The combination is a present perfect tense.

2. "Will have left" is a future perfect tense.

3. "Has been" is the present perfect tense.

4. "Had lost" is a past perfect tense.

5. "Will have finished" is a future perfect tense.

6. "Had not believed" is the past perfect tense.

7. "Have worked" is a present perfect tense.

8. "Had not decided" is a past perfect tense.

9. "Had cleared" is a past perfect tense.

10. "Have the Ortons found" is a present perfect tense.

7 0

2 years ago

Which sentence from an essay is most likely a restatement of the thesis in

Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

c, "as these details have shown." is used when restating a point you already made

6 0

2 years ago