Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
0.0 I’m scared to go up a grade0-0
B)The Supremacy Clause states that no judge can contradict federal laws.
The Supremacy Clause is a clause in Article VI of the United States Constitution. This Clause commands that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." This law implies that authorities in each state should adhere to the Constitutional laws and treaties of the federal government in the affairs which are indirectly or directly under the government's control.
The duty “is imperative upon the state judges", in their official capacities. From their judicial duties, it would call judges to proclaim the laws applicable to the case in judgment. They cannot decide judgment according to the rules or Constitution of the State, but their judgment should be in accordance to the laws and treaties of the United States.
Answer: by using local property taxes to fund public schools, trapping poor children in poor schools
Explanation: Jonathan Kozol is an American writer, educator, and activist best known for his publications on public education in the United States. In savage inequalities, Kozol pointed out how students from poor family background are trapped in poorly funded schools since public school funding comes from local property taxes which vary widely between communities.
The basis of Kozol's argument is the comparisons between rich and poor school districts, in particular the amount of money spent per child. School districts with relatively wealthy property-owners are spending over $20,000 per year per child while school districts where poor people live spend about $11,000 per year per child.
The pertinent question he asks is whether it is fair or right that the place of one's birth or residence should determine the quality of education a child is entitled to.
