Answer: Option (D)
Explanation:
From the given case or scenario, we can state that since there are no additional changes are made then the following statement in accordance with the review of revised protocol is correct, i.e. Unless or until nature of these questions would tend to keep the scale of the risk to mere more than the minimal for the adolescents, then the research would be more likely to still qualify for the expedited review.
Answer:
B: Purposive incentives
Explanation:
Purposive incentives appeal to someone's concern about a cause because they feel satisfaction about taking part of something they believe in and agree with, and it is based on ideologial principles and ethical beliefs . It's a benefit for them because everyone needs some kind of reward, but it does not come necessarily in form of material rewards or bonus.
The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for three main reasons:
1) If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot ``feel'' this motion. Nor does this motion give rise to any obvious observational consequences. Hence, the Earth must be stationary.
—————————————
2) If the Earth is executing a circular orbit around the Sun then the positions of the stars should be slightly different when the Earth is on opposite sides of the Sun. This effect is known as parallax. Since no stellar parallax is observable (at least, with the naked eye), the Earth must be stationary. In order to appreciate the force of this argument, it is important to realize that ancient astronomers did not suppose the stars to be significantly further away from the Earth than the planets. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just beyond the orbit of Saturn.
—————————————
3)The geocentric model is far more philosophically attractive than the heliocentric model, since in the former model the Earth occupies a privileged position in the Universe.
I don't believe so.
Government intervention (such as welfares) is actually a good policy to help poor people sustain themselves for a short period of time .
But, in order to fully eliminate their poverty, Government should focus itself to help poor people get a good job to sustain their own living, otherwise, the Government just hemorrhaging expenditures and increases national debt overtime