Political speech is important in our system because the country (AKA America) runs off of political views and opinions
The most difficult challenges faced by the plymouth and jamestown settlers were not starving to death, since they were unfamiliar with the territory and farming practices needed for the land, and dealing with hostile Native Americans, since many natives viewed them (correctly) as being a threat.
Answer:
<em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>Discrim</em><em>ination</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
woman's suffregette
Explanation:
kwksosoowowowowoekekekeowowow
Answer/Explanation:
During the 1900s the U.S government passed two laws which were viewed as oppressive of the rights and freedom of speech of American citizens during war. These legislations were the Sedition Act of 1918 and the Espionage Act which made it an offense for anyone to write, print, utter or publish or aid the writing, printing, uttering or publication of anything that is scandalous, abusive, defamatory, or disloyal of the government of the United States or its military and is capable of bringing the government or its military into contempt or disregard, or instigate resistance against the government or the military during a time when the country is at war.
Unfortunately, in the wake of World War I, Charles Scheck who was a socialist and a U.S politician opposed America's involvement in the first World War. During the subsistence of the war, he wrote, published and distributed articles and leaflets expressing his view on the participation of America in the war. He was subsequently charged to Court for contravening the provisions of the Espionage and Sedition Act and was found guilty. The U.S Supreme Court held that the language used by Charles in his publications was seditious of the government and capable of instigating resistance against the government and her military during the war. The court held that no court could guarantee Charles' language as used in his publications during the war. The Court further held that Charles through his publications caused panic amongst the citizens, and that the circumstances at which those publications were in circulation being a time when the U.S was involved in a war warranted the conviction of Charles.